What exactly did occur in the latest episode of the Kavanaugh Confirmation Fiasco?

By Jerome S. Kaufman

October 1, 2018

As predicted in the Israel Commentary article of Sep 23, 2018:

“Republican Party about to go down the tube with wuss, Sen.Grassley, mis-managing phony witness fiasco.”

www.israel-commentary.org

The Republican Party is indeed going “down the tube”. Sean Hannity of Fox News,in disgust, said immediately after the Kavanaugh/Christine Ford hearings that the Republican Party had “‘caved” — actually collapsed and fell right into the trap the Democrats had so cleverly set demanding yet another FBI investigation.

The Wall Street Journal of Sep 20, 2018 points out in their editorial, Politicizing the FBI, that the Democrats want the FBI to investigate an alleged assault from 35-36 years ago and provide commentary and issue judgments. That is not the FBI role. The Senate Judicial Committee has that unique role and does not have the right to relinquish the role to anyone.

Totally ignored was the Senate Justice Committee’s oft-repeated indisputable fact that the FBI had completed at least 6 previous thorough investigations of Judge Kavanaugh and found exactly nothing. No mention of any teen-age sex party or previous contact with accuser Dr. Christine Basey Ford whatever.

Furthermore, there was no creditable witness confirming Christine’s charges. The Wall Street Journal of Sep 25, 2018 describes these charges as:

“those of a dimly recalled incident from 35 years ago, when Mr. Kavanaugh may or may not have been present, which alleged eye witnesses deny attending, and about which the corroboration is second hand and unspecific.” Christine Ford’s charge is nevertheless conveniently submitted as fact by the Democratic Party with malice aforethought.

The next inexplicable mistake was that the Republican chaired Senate Judiciary Committee allowed this lady, conveniently brought out by the Democrats from the woodwork of 35 years ago, to publicly address the Committee before a nation-wide TV audience despite the lack of any confirming evidence whatever. Is this to be the norm wherein anyone making a claim, without any substantiating evidence is given a Senate Judicial Committee hearing and a world-wide TV audience?

The second error was to allow a neutral professional interrogator, Rachel Mitchell, to question Christine Ford before the world-wide cameras.

She did so in a calculated soft and un-alarming, virtually therapeutic manner. The witness was allowed to drone on for endless minutes plaintively describing in great detail the episode of 35 years ago without one interruption from the “interrogator” other than a therapeutic,”OK”

(Since this was originally written, Ms. Mitchell has announced her final findings and conclusions. She found no evidence whatever of Judge Kavanaugh’s presence in the incident Christine Ford described. She also stated that there were several inconsistencies in Dr. Ford’s testimony, the story would never hold up in court and no ethical prosecutor would ever bring the case to court. It does not hold water.)

A review of the Judicial Committee hearing was made shortly afterward by Yahoo News under the declared auspices of Katie Couric and the Yahoo News Staff.

Great exception was taken to the so-called facts presented in the Yahoo review and an additional Fact-Check was conducted.


FACT-CHECK Yahoo!News.

1. True. Dr Christine Blasey Ford is a Professor at Palo Alto University. However Yahoo!News forgot to mention that Palo Alto University is known as a very liberal university.

2. True. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is a registered Democrat. And an activist that has participated in multiple Anti-Trump functions. Perhaps her monetary donations were small – $80 (compared to big donors) but she donated none the less.

What Yahoo!News fails to mention:

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford spoke with #MeToo activists for advice as to how to approach spreading her story.

She also “selected” a Democratic activist as an attorney, a partner in a firm that has donated major money to the Democratic Party and is Vice Chair for an organization funded by none other than George Soros!

By the way, who is paying Dr Ford’s legal bills?

(George Soros incidentally is a politically hyperactive billionaire who has contributed over $25 million to various Liberal and Democrat Party groups working to defeat in 2004 then President George W. Bush and has continued massive contributions to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton).

He has been advancing a world-wide radical agenda back to 1979 via his Open Society Foundation. His history goes back much further when he, although born a Jew, was directly involved by the Nazis as a teen-ager to ferret out hidden Jews for execution. Soros proudly declares he enjoyed his work for the Nazis as a high point of his youth.)

4). True. The claim that Kavanaugh’s Mom was a judge in a case that involved a foreclosure of Dr Ford’s parents back in late 1990s is true. However she ruled in favor of Dr Ford’s parents and allowed the mortgage company to drop the foreclosure. This myth was cleared up weeks ago and not really a myth.

Now, the FACTS, not mentioned in this Yahoo!News article.

1). FACT. Dr. Ford sent a confidential letter to her US Representative informing her of a sexual encounter 35+ years ago with Brett Kavanaugh at a party. In the letter, she stated that the “party” involved her and four others.

2). FACT. Dr Ford received and provided notes from a couple counseling session that stated that Dr Ford had discussed a sexual incident back in high school with four boys in the room. No names were provided nor reported.

3). FACT. Dr Ford claims that the psychologist’s notes were incorrect, that there were only two boys in the room with her, Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge.

4). FACT. Brett Kavanaugh adamantly denied any involvement, and Mark Judge adamantly denied being present at any such party, and although he was a friend of Brett Kavanaugh, he never saw Brett Kavanaugh act as described.

Who were the other two boys at the party? Dr Ford named a third boy, someone called PJ, who was identified as Patrick J Smyth who also denied being at any party as described by Dr Ford. That’s 3 for 3 against Dr Ford’s claims.

5). FACT. Later in a TV interview, Dr Ford’s attorney claimed that there was another girl at the party but did name her. Who was the other girl? Who was the fourth boy? Who was really at this “party”? Was it Dr Ford and four boys, or was it Dr Ford, another girl and four boys, or was it Dr Ford, three boys and another girl? Who were the other participants? The 4 or 5 other participants are the only first hand witnesses that can verify Dr Ford’s claims.

6). FACT. The “party” supposedly at a residential home in the Georgetown area but Dr Ford hasn’t provided a location or who’s home it was. None the less, the “party” apparently involved 4, 5, or 6 underaged teenagers drinking at someone’s home.

Summary:

So, where are we after all this. We are to have one more week of yet another FBI unwarranted “investigation. This is an obvious successful attempt by the Democrats, thanks to the Republicans, to delay the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Democrat Senatorial Leader Chuck Schumer, within a few minutes of Judge Kavanaugh’s original nomination, declared that he would do every thing possible to upend the confirmation. He has since done a great job of trying to eliminate one of the most qualified man we have ever had for Supreme Court Justice.

The pundits all know that the FBI information will not change one vote in either direction. Let us hope that Chairman Grassley does not allow the FBI one minute beyond the one week and not permit the Democrats to con him around once again.

To my mind he should demand the FBI report by Monday, present it to the Judicial Committee right then and have already scheduled the vote that day or the day later conforming right now to the 3 day notice requirement. Take the vote and let the chips fall where they may. If some Republicans are still ready to abandon their party and vote solely in their own misguided self interests, let them suffer the political and personal consequences the rest of their lives. I am sure Sen. Lindsay Graham will remember their actions forever.

We can only pray that despite the dedicated efforts of the Democrats and the sometimes feeble resistance of the Republicans, divine forces will intervene; Schumer will not succeed; justice will prevail and this great nation will reap the badly needed associated benefits.

Respectfully submitted,

Jerome S. Kaufman

To subscribe to Israel Commentary: Send your email address to
israelcommentary@comcast.net

Please “Like” on Facebook:  1. Israel Commentary  2) Jerome S. Kaufman
Web Page: https://israel-commentary.org for previous articles