Plus please see Video below. Moshe Feiglin gets elected to 14th spot on Likud list and should become an MK in the January, 2013 election, unless Netanyahu succeeds in eliminating him from the list as he did prior to the last election. I don’t think Netanyahu can do that this time. The political climate has changed and Israelis are tired of being targets in their own homeland. The video is in Hebrew and I did not understand a word but it is fun to watch the excitement and joy in Feiglin’s selection. jsk
Jewish Destiny or Iron Dome?
By Moshe Feiglin
Translated from the Makor Rishon newspaper
Nov. 23, 2012
After the Pillar of Defense cease fire on the Gaza border, many now understand what we understood after the Zo Artzeinu demonstrations: The Israeli crisis is not on the continuum between Right and Left. It is on the continuum between Israelis and their Jewish identity.
We knew exactly where the Oslo Accords would lead. The huge amount of people who answered Zo Artzeinu’s calls and blocked traffic in the entire country understood the reality. (Zo Artzeinu (Hebrew: This is our land) was a right-wing nationalist political protest movement created and led by Moshe Feiglin and Shmuel Sackett in Israel to block Israeli land concessions to the Arabs in the early 1990s, especially the Oslo Accords.)
Ultimately, we succeeded in electing the Right to rule – against all odds. But Zo Artzeinu refused to politically “cash in” on the tremendous public credit that it had accrued. We understood that the Right also had no solution and that it was also incapable of getting off the Oslo track.
Everyone is angry at Netanyahu now for signing the cease-fire. But Netanyahu’s predicament is a precise reflection of post-Oslo Israeli society. If Netanyahu had ordered a ground invasion of Gaza, soldiers would have been killed. After a short period of time he would have pulled the troops out of Gaza without significant achievements. After all, he had no intention of remaining. The retreat after many more fatalities would have ignited much more virulent criticism.
To remain in Gaza, we first have to renounce the very essence of the idea of partitioning this Land. We have to internalize that this is our Land – exclusively. We must – on a national scale – return to the Land of Israel and our Jewish identity. We must beg the forgiveness of the Jews expelled from Gush Katif and rebuild their towns and villages with the forces that destroyed them – and bring them back to their rightful place with an honor guard.
We must vote with our feet, declaring to all that this is our Land, proving to our enemies that this is NOT their land. Most important: We must expel the Moslem wakf from the Temple Mount and restore exclusive Israeli sovereignty over the Mount – Judaism’s most holy site. We must encourage Jews to ascend the Temple Mount after the proper halachic preparations and to actualize their sovereignty over the beating heart of the Jewish Nation.
If we do not take all these measures, there really is no reason to endanger our soldiers just so that they can go into Gaza and retreat again. Every round of this type of fighting only proves the enemy’s claim that we are colonialist conquerors and not liberators in our own Land. Security and pragmatic claims don’t convince the world anymore.
The Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial no longer does the work for us. It can’t be a replacement for the true justice of our cause. Just a short time after a hypothetical ground invasion of Gaza, international public opinion would come down squarely on the side that talks about justice: the very justice that we, with the cursed Oslo handshake, deposited into the hands of Arafat.
Is Israeli society ready for this type of return to ourselves?
Netanyahu expresses the dichotomy in Israeli society between the “Israeli” who wants to escape to “normalcy” by disengaging from the Land of Israel and the “Jew” who wants to connect to his identity and national destiny – expressed by loyalty to the Land of Israel.
Many will now try to escape this complex reality by voting for the rightist parties. If they are too successful, the result will be that the next government coalition will not be formed by Netanyahu and Bennett, but by Yechimovitz, Lapid and Deri. The political situation in Israel is also part of the same dichotomy. It expresses the same dead end mentality that brought about the defeat. Everyone is stuck in Oslo.
The Israelis want the best of both worlds: security and normalcy. But it has become quite clear that it is specifically the mental servitude to Oslo, the flight from destiny to the enslavement to normalcy and pragmatism – that has so severely compromised Israel’s security.
It turns out that it is actually the “delusional extremists,” the “propellers” (as Rabin derisively called those who opposed Oslo) who are the most realistic of all. It turns out that the choice that the Israelis are being forced to make is not between living under a bare-headed secularism or a kippah of observance. Their choice is between their Jewish destiny or living under an Iron Dome